Get instant access to this case solution for only $15
Diamond Foods Inc Case Solution
Diamond Foods, a company created as a cooperative by Walnut farmers was thriving under the leadership of Mendes with earnings increasing and it looking towards acquiring established companies such as Pop Secret, Kettle Foods, and Pringles. However, an investigation into the company’s financial health by Wall Street Consulting Group, after receiving an anonymous tip proved that reality was different than it appeared in the market. Diamond Foods had been underpaying its walnut suppliers which was causing unrest. To counter this problem, they launched momentum payments which are deferred to the next accounting period in order to improve current year income. This attempt of earning management ‘accounting for nuts’ was unethical as it gave a misleading figure for profits. There existed pressure to commit fraud on management in order to keep up with ambitious targets set by executives and retain its positive image in the market to go through with the acquisitions.
Following questions are answered in this case study solution
In this case, Diamond Foods was accused of “managing earnings” in an unethical manner. Provide two specific examples of how a company could ethically improve net income.
Describe the “fraud triangle.” Discuss the components of the fraud triangle in the context of this case.
One of the red flags identified in the case was that operating cash flow increases did not seem to match the level of increase in net income. Explain the relationship between these two measures and why it raised questions about the quality of earnings at Diamond Foods.
Why were the actions of Diamond Foods with respect to its ‘accounting for nuts’ unethical?
Based on the facts of the case, do you think the auditors from Deloitte could have done more to identify the fraud at Diamond Foods? Were there any apparent deficiencies in their audit procedures and evaluation of the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements of Diamond Foods? Explain.
Case Analysis for Diamond Foods Inc
1. In this case, Diamond Foods was accused of “managing earnings” in an unethical manner. Provide two specific examples of how a company could ethically improve net income.
Earnings management is a technique adopted by many companies to improve the income reported on their financial statements by using accounting techniques to their advantage to either increase revenue or decrease expenses.
An example of decreasing expense to inflate income is seen in momentum payments issued to walnut farmers by Diamond Foods. The company had historically kept the price paid to farmers for walnuts 20 to 15 cents lower than the market price. These low costs led to high-profit margins for the company as the cost of sales decreased or remained constant while net sales and gross profit percentage increased. Diamond Foods was able to achieve this through momentum payments that promised 35 cents a pound to raise 2010 payments to $1.35 pound, however, Diamond declared it to be a loyalty bonus that shouldn’t be applied to 2011 harvest. By deferring these payments to next year, Diamond was able to lower the value of the costs for fiscal year 2011 by charging payments to farmers at only $1 a pound compared to $1.45 a pound in the market, with the 35 cents a pound shifted to next year. Hence costs were lowered while most of these nuts were sold within the year and revenue for them was recorded in fiscal year 2011. This caused the gross margin to increase and the net income was inflated by clever earnings management by Diamond Foods.
Another way to ethically improve net income is by manipulating account receivables to influence the revenue recognized for the year. Bad debts expense that are part of account receivable involves judgment and estimation on part of accountants. They are based on past results and industry standards to be a certain percentage of total credit sales with the percentage being decided by the company itself. By reducing the percentage of uncollectible debts, a company can increase its value of account receivables which will increase revenue and hence inflate net income.
2. Describe the “fraud triangle.” Discuss the components of the fraud triangle in the context of this case.
Fraud triangle is a framework that is used to analyze a person’s reasons behind committing a fraud. The fraud triangle constitutes of three components, opportunity, pressure and rationalization. Opportunity is the circumstances that enable fraud to occur and can range from weak internal controls to lack of quality control in an organization. Pressure is the incentive or motivation that instigates a person or organization to commit fraud while rationalization is the justification given to one's own self to justify why committing the fraudulent activity is justified.
In the context of Diamond Foods, the opportunity for fraud lies in the payment methods to walnut farmers in the forms of installments that allowed it to defer costs to next year. Board of Director’s members were aware of this nature of payments that could be used to record payments in later years as they have years of experience in the industry. Internal controls of Diamond Foods were not sufficient to detect any such accounting fraud, nor did the tone at top stress on ethical behavior which was an opportunity to commit fraud.
Get instant access to this case solution for only $15
Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15
Save $10 on your purchase
Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution
Calculate the Price
Get More Out of This
Our essay writing services are the best in the world. If you are in search of a professional essay writer, place your order on our website.