Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Billy's Beats Inc Case Solution

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
543 596 Words (2 Pages) John R. Wells, Travis Haglock Harvard Business School : 706413
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File

The case study is based on the audit assignment of Billy beats Inc., a musical instrument manufacturing company, for the year 20X1. Billy beats acquired littler drummer, a drum manufacturing company, during the year. Fair Value of plant acquired was determined to be $865. It was allocated to the acquired asset classes via percentage of cost method. The task of determining and allocating the fair value was completed by an independent valuation expert. The management decided not to change the useful life estimates of little drummer’s property plant equipment although they differed substantially from estimate basis employed by Billy beats for its own PPE.

Following questions are answered in this case study solution:

  1. Summary

  2. ​Answer

Billy s Beats Inc Case Analysis

The case also mentions Rock out Inc., another wholly owned subsidiary of Billy beats, which has grown rapidly in previous years through acquiring other guitar manufacturing companies. Management of Rock out Inc. made a change and revised the accounting estimate of economic life of customer lists, one of its major intangible asset, because they believed the new estimate will better reflect the pattern in which economic benefit from the customer lists will be utilized. The change was applied only to the newly acquired customer lists.

2. Answer

The audit engagement team was assigned the task to perform adequate substantive procedures in order to give an opinion about the appropriateness of management’s assumptions. Substantive procedures include applying adequate analytical procedures and testing details, but the engagement team failed to do so. While addressing the issue of estimate of useful life of acquired assets the audit team only discussed it with plant manager and documented that discussion in audit working papers which clearly wasn’t sufficient. Their responsibility entailed that they should have checked the competency of plant manager that whether he had the required skill and expertise to determine the useful life of assets. Secondly they should have determined the objectivity of plant manager that whether he was being influenced by upper management or not in his decision making. Lastly, the team should have asked the management to provide a detailed basis for assuming same useful life estimates as determined by acquired company.

Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15

Standard Price

$25

Save $10 on your purchase

-$10

Amount to Pay

$15

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

Get More Out of This

Our essay writing services are the best in the world. If you are in search of a professional essay writer, place your order on our website.

Essay Writing Service
whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon