Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Alibabas IPO Dilemma Hong Kong or New York

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
2800 1495 Words (7 Pages) Emir Hrnjic Ivey Publishing : W14598
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File

This case study examines the decision faced by Alibaba Group, a Chinese e-commerce giant, on where to list its initial public offering (IPO). The company had the choice of listing either on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), each with its own set of benefits and drawbacks. Hong Kong has a large pool of potential investors with a strong interest in Chinese technology companies such as Alibaba. However, Hong Kong's stock exchange does not allow companies with dual-class share structures, which is the structure Alibaba's management wanted to maintain. On the other hand, listing on the NYSE would have allowed Alibaba to have a dual-class share structure and access to a larger pool of global investors. Additionally, listing on the NYSE could have generated a larger IPO for Alibaba. However, listing on the NYSE would have required Alibaba to comply with stricter regulatory and governance requirements, which might expose the company to greater legal and reputational risks. In the end, Alibaba chose to list on the NYSE in 2014, raising $25 billion in the largest IPO in history at the time, but faced a number of issues, such as the scrutiny of its business practices and corporate governance standards.

Following questions are answered in this case study solution:

  1. Evaluate the reasons for a firm to go public, and how they may be affected by where that company chooses to list.

  2. Consider the trade-offs of strict information revelation standards.

  3. Compare the Asian and US IPO processes.

  4. Explore the ethics and tradeoffs of dual class shares with different voting rights.

Case Study Questions Answers

1. Evaluate the reasons for a firm to go public and how they may be affected by where that company chooses to list.

There are several reasons for a firm to go public. A company might need access to capital which it can get through shares to the public, which can be used for expansion, research and development, and other business activities. Moreover, a company might want to be more liquid, and public trading allows shareholders to easily buy and sell shares on the open market. Additionally, going public can enhance a company's reputation and prestige, as it shows that the company is financially successful and has passed the criteria of regulators. Lastly, a firm can use stock options as a form of compensation for employees, which can be an attractive incentive for getting and retaining top talent. The main reason why Alibaba went public was to raise capital to fund its acquisitions.

The choice of where a company chooses to list can affect these reasons in the following ways. Different stock exchanges have different listing requirements and can attract different types of investors. For example, listing on a more global and prestigious exchange such as the NYSE or NASDAQ may make it easier for a company to raise capital from institutional investors. Moreover, the liquidity of a company's shares can be affected by the exchange on which it is listed. Shares listed on a major exchange such as the NYSE or NASDAQ may have higher trading volumes and be more liquid than shares listed on a smaller exchange. Additionally, listing on a prestigious exchange can enhance a company's reputation and prestige, as it signifies that the company has met the exchange's listing requirements and is financially successful. Lastly, listing on a major exchange can make it easier for a company to offer stock options as a form of compensation, as the shares will be more liquid and easier to value.

2. Consider the trade-offs of strict information revelation standards.

Strict information revelation standards refer to the regulations and requirements put in place that all public limited companies must follow when disclosing information to the public, such as their financial statements, overall performance, and other relevant data. These standards help ensure transparency and accountability, which protects investors from fraud. However, there are trade-offs to consider when it comes to strict information revelation standards. First, complying with strict information revelation standards can be costly for companies, as they may need to hire additional staff or consultants to ensure compliance.

Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15

Standard Price

$25

Save $10 on your purchase

-$10

Amount to Pay

$15

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon