Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Hitting The Target Optimizing A Private Equity Portfolio With Partners Group Case Solution

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
2246 1077 Words (4 Pages) Anne-Marie Carrick, Bowen White, Claudia Zeisberger INSEAD : IN1348
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File

The Future Plan’s PE programme was launched in 2005 and since its inception, the Future Plan was unable to achieve the target allocation of capital in the desired asset class and the returns posted by the funds were satisfactory. Currently, the Future plan was generating a target return of 9% from the other asset classes while the expected return from PE Programme was between 12% and 16%. As Future Plan initiated its footprint in PE industry through closed-end FOF managed by Bellex Capital in 2005 and in Arkridge closed-end FOF in 2006 followed by its first investment in direct PE fund which would invest in infrastructure asset in Europe.

Following questions are answered in this case study solution

  1. In what ways had Future Plan’s PE programme underperformed since inception? What factors contributed to this underperformance? 

  2. How did Future Plan’s IC adjust the PE programme’s mandate following the major strategy review, and what did they hope to achieve with these changes? 

  3. What impact would adding secondary and direct investments have on Future Plan’s PE portfolio (consider Exhibits 8a-8c)?

Case Analysis for Hitting The Target Optimizing A Private Equity Portfolio With Partners Group

Since, PE investment of Future Plan started to gain traction on account of the turbulence experienced by the international market which came on the back of the financial crisis of 2008. The mortgage crisis hit the global markets severely and companies from several industries filed for bankruptcy. The investment made by the closed-end funds in PE funds which hold private companies influenced by the debt crisis. Future has invested approximately Euro 70 million in closed-end FOFs and direct PE funds during 2006-7 while raising its target allocation in PE to 3%. A considerable part of the investment was affected by the global crisis which caused some PE holdings of Future Plan’s investment to go bankrupt. As a result, the investment of Future Plan took a hit, and the pace of invested capital in PE got further slower (it was already underinvested). 

Moreover, the private infrastructure asset class contribute significantly to the fall out of PE holdings of Future Plan since it was a hard hit on account of the mortgage crisis. The direct PE fund in which future had invested, experienced many tractions to its investment in infrastructure asset thereby influencing the overall PE portfolio of Future plan badly. Despite of the unsatisfactory performance of the funds and privately held companies of direct PE funds, the Future Plan overall return was also deteriorated on account of multiple layers of fees charges by the closed-end FOFs and direct PE funds. In this regard, the PE programme of Future Plan could not show expected performance. 

2. How did Future Plan’s IC adjust the PE programme’s mandate following the major strategy review, and what did they hope to achieve with these changes? 

The Future plan decided not to abandon and sell the PE investment rather they intended to build more flexibility and add more improvement in execution to their existing PE investments. In this regard, they recognized that their investment in PE was too narrow whereby they invest in primary PE through closed-end FOFs therefore they decided to broaden their outreach and mandated their external managers to grab any potential opportunity which they deem fit for creating desired return for the fund. The company adjusted its strategy to look for previously overlooked strategic tools of investment in PE including the secondary and direct investments. This strategic adjustment would allow Future Plan to achieve various benefits. These benefits include access to funds with more mature portfolios increasing the pace of NAV development through the purchase of LP interest in existing PE funds in the secondary market thereby providing Future Plan with higher visibility than a private fund commitment. The private fund commitment gives lesser discretion to the Future Plan manager to control the flow of capital towards a specific asset class as opposed to the direct and secondary investment.  

Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15

Standard Price

$25

Save $10 on your purchase

-$10

Amount to Pay

$15

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

Get More Out of This

Our essay writing services are the best in the world. If you are in search of a professional essay writer, place your order on our website.

Essay Writing Service
whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon