Get instant access to this case solution for only $19

TravelCenters Of America Case Solution

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
1926 1025 Words (5 Pages) Robin Greenwood, Daniel Goldberg, James Quinn Harvard Business School : 209030
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File and An Excel File An Excel File

Using the facts and figures given in case, the fair value of New-TA is calculated to be around $72.96 per share through dividend discount model. This is the value directed by the strong fundamentals of the company or which the company will be expected to trade at in the long term future. However, this value may not be evident in the near future period due to the market sentiments and elements over riding the company's strong fundamentals.

Following questions are answered in this case study solution

  1. Why is HPT undertaking this transaction? Is this a good deal for HPT shareholders?

  2. Why does HPT spin off New-TA, rather than using the other means of restructuring such as carve-out, sell-offs, or tracking stock?

  3. What is the enterprise value of New-TA based on the 9/30/06 balance sheet data and the market price of $29.00 on February 1, 2007? Why did HPT spin-off New-TA with $213 million of cash on its balance sheet?

  4. What is the fair value of one share of New-TA?

  5. Does the New-TA situation embody many of the characteristics that make spin-offs attractive value investing opportunities?

21629092096.png
11629092096.png

Case Analysis for TravelCenters Of America Case Solution

1. Why is HPT undertaking this transaction? Is this a good deal for HPT shareholders?

Travel Centers of America has a highly intricate, yet developed, network of travel centers across America. TA’s network consists of 163 travel centers. TA’s portfolio covers various varieties of products and services such as gasoline and diesel fuel, maintenance services, truck repairs, convenience stores and full service restaurants. During the year 2006, TA reported 4.8 billion dollars of revenues and gross profits of 664 million dollar.

Recently, HPT had agreed to purchase TA for 1.9 billion dollars. After the spin-off transaction, HPT would still be able to retain all of TA’s real estate properties. The main purpose of HPT behind acquiring TA was to diversify and expand the sources of generating revenues. TA fulfills this reason because it has business operations sites at significant places. Moreover, the hotels industry in which the two businesses are operating are recession resistant. In addition to that, shareholders will be better off with this transaction as TA will provide a tax shield for HPT. This means that overall profits of the HPT will increase and hence the shareholder value will maximize.

2. Why does HPT spin off New-TA, rather than using the other means of restructuring such as carve-out, sell-offs, or tracking stock?

HPT preferred spin off transaction over carve out, sell off or trading stock because spin off provides the most benefits as compared to the other strategies. Firstly, spin off transaction provides tax protection, which would ultimately help in increasing the shareholder value. Being a new firm, New-TA will get favorable taxation policies from the government than it could have gotten while under the ownership of HPT. This ultimately maximizes shareholder value, which in turn is the basic principle of any company.

Furthermore, through spin off, HPT will be able to expand and diversify its business. This implies that HPT will be able to generate significantly higher value of revenues in the future. Also, the spin off transaction will provide more flexibility to the management team of New-TA in terms of better decision making for the company.

On the other hand, if HPT would have applied the strategy of sell-offs, then HPT would have lost the management control over TA. Re-structuring of the company would have resulted in employee turnover, significantly. Moreover, restructuring the organization completely can damage the firm’s reputation in public. Also, it could have provided the competitors, with valuable assets, which would have been unfavorable for the stakeholders of HPT. Finally, the option of tracking stocks would have been very costly for HPT given the transaction costs and could have generated a negative perception of the company in the stock market. Therefore, tracking stock would have increased the financial leverage of HPT.

Get instant access to this case solution for only $19

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $19

Standard Price

$25

Save $6 on your purchase

-$6

Amount to Pay

$19

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon