Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

PepsiCo Profits and Food The Belt Tightens

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
2844 1572 Words (5 Pages) Joseph L. Badaracco, Matthew Preble Harvard Business School : 314055
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File

Under the direction of CEO Indra Nooyi, PepsiCo struggled to find the right balance between marketing its classic unhealthy snacks and drinks and putting money into healthier alternatives. In response to criticism, Nooyi began a strategic evaluation of the business in 2011 to explore how best to divide resources between more healthful options and well-known brands like Pepsi-Cola and Doritos. The company's focus on healthier options experienced difficulties because of consumer preferences for convenience and flavour, despite Nooyi's efforts to promote healthier options, including lowering the amounts of fat and sugar in treats and broadening the portfolio to give more healthy options. In the end, Nooyi's investments in the "Good-for-You" sector paid off, with PepsiCo's healthier portfolio growing faster than its conventional portfolio. However, issues with the company's labour policies and environmental impact persisted. Overall, the case illustrates the challenges faced by the food and beverage industry when attempting to balance business interests with social responsibility.

Following questions are answered in this case study solution:

  1. In response to mounting criticism, Nooyi launched a strategic review of PepsiCo to answer some fundamental questions in late 2011. Please answer with the time focused on 2011: What was the right balance in terms of investments and management focus between PepsiCo's major brands, such as Pepsi-Cola and Doritos, and its healthier offerings? Was it possible to succeed with a focus on nutritious foods, considering its broad product portfolio and competitor’s eager to eat away at its market share? How long could Nooyi accept subpar performance while developing the Good-for-You category? Where should Nooyi place her bets for PepsiCo? What should Nooyi do to protect PepsiCo's position in developed markets such as the US? What products should it develop and sell for emerging markets, and should it try to get ahead of the potential obesity crisis in these countries?

  2. Now take the 2015 perspective and answer: Where was Nooyi right? Where was she wrong or too optimistic?

  3. Please solve the case study by developing your analysis, alternatives, and recommendation.

Case Study Questions Answers

1. In response to mounting criticism, Nooyi launched a strategic review of PepsiCo to answer some fundamental questions in late 2011. Please answer with the time focused on 2011: What was the right balance in terms of investments and management focus between PepsiCo's major brands, such as Pepsi-Cola and Doritos, and its healthier offerings? Was it possible to succeed with a focus on nutritious foods, considering its broad product portfolio and competitor's eager to eat away at its market share? How long could Nooyi accept subpar performance while developing the Good-for-You category? Where should Nooyi place her bets for PepsiCo? What should Nooyi do to protect PepsiCo's position in developed markets such as the US? What products should it develop and sell for emerging markets, and should it try to get ahead of the potential obesity crisis in these countries?

Indra Nooyi, CEO of PepsiCo, began a strategic assessment of the business in late 2011 to address growing criticism and respond to fundamental inquiries about the relationship between PepsiCo's well-known brands and its healthier options. The study sought to strike the ideal balance between the company's core products, including Pepsi-Cola and Doritos, and its healthier options in terms of investments and management concentration. Given PepsiCo's wide range of products and rivals' determination to syphon off market share, the crucial question was whether it was possible to compete with a concentration on healthy meals. Consumers, governments, and public health advocates were putting increasing pressure on PepsiCo to address obesity and other health problems linked to its products.

While creating the Good-for-You category, Nooyi had to decide how long she could put up with mediocre results. Although Tropicana orange juice and Quaker Oats were made with significant expenditure by PepsiCo, these products did not provide as much income and profit as the company's core products. In order to keep up with shifting customer preferences and defend PepsiCo's position in developed regions like the US, Nooyi had to concentrate on product development and innovation. To meet the increased demand for healthier solutions, it was necessary to continue making investments in research and development.

Nooyi had to choose which goods PepsiCo should create and market in emerging regions while taking into account the impending obesity epidemic in these nations. Concerns concerning the effect of the company's products on public health need to be addressed while maintaining a balance between the company's growth goals and its social duty.

So, Nooyi's strategic evaluation also tried to pinpoint the instances in which she was accurate and those in which she might have been excessively pessimistic. The increased consumer demand for healthy alternatives aligned with her focus on healthier options. Still, the average performance of the Good-for-You category resulted in concerns about the likelihood of reaching rapid success. Finding the ideal balance between the core brands that were the primary source of PepsiCo's revenue and the healthy alternatives was a massive challenge for Nooyi. 

Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15

Standard Price

$25

Save $10 on your purchase

-$10

Amount to Pay

$15

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon