Get instant access to this case solution for only $9

Entrepreneurial Finance In Finland Case Solution

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
2043 444 Words (3 Pages) William R. Kerr, Ramana Nanda, Alexis Brownell Harvard Business School : 813068
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File

In early periods, it was a common perception in Finland that a new start-up is established only when one is not able to get a job at an existing company. It was further noticed that government funding usually involved an element of bureaucracy and sometimes couldn’t be utilized for product commercialization. As venture capitalists/angel investors were also less in number, so, private money was less available for early-stage companies in Finland (Kerr, Nanda and Brownell, 2013).

Following questions are answered in this case study solution

  1. What factors lie behind the poor early-stage financing in Finland? 

  2. What are the basic differences across four models under consideration? 

  3. How should Ami and Otso structure their ventures? What specific “gaps” for the Nordic Region must their business model address? 

  4. Consider Italy instead of Finland—what are the opportunities and challenges in your entrepreneurship ecosystem? 

  5. Personal Takeaways can be derived from this Case? 

Case Analysis for Entrepreneurial Finance In Finland Case Solution

2. What are the basic differences across four models under consideration? 

  1. Accelerator: short-term (fixed end-date); provide support, coaching, training, and hands-on work opportunity; don’t provide large amounts of funding (average investment size: 10-20 thousand euro).

  2. Incubator: long-term (no fixed end-date); provide training, networking opportunity, and various services (like marketing/accounting guidance, infrastructure, office space, and equipment, shared conference room, reception, and internet services); connect with VCs but generally don’t provide financing.   

  3. Micro-VC: attract funding from outside sources; smaller pool than traditional VCs (average investment size: 75 million euro).

  4. VC (traditional): attract funding from outside sources; larger pool than micro-VC (multi-million euro fund) (Ries, 2011).

3. How should Ami and Otso structure their ventures? What specific “gaps” for the Nordic Region must their business model address? 

Get instant access to this case solution for only $9

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $9

Standard Price

$25

Save $16 on your purchase

-$16

Amount to Pay

$9

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon