Get instant access to this case solution for only $9
Entrepreneurial Finance In Finland Case Solution
| Solution Id | Length | Case Author | Case Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2043 | 444 Words (3 Pages) | William R. Kerr, Ramana Nanda, Alexis Brownell | Harvard Business School : 813068 |
A Word File
In early periods, it was a common perception in Finland that a new start-up is established only when one is not able to get a job at an existing company. It was further noticed that government funding usually involved an element of bureaucracy and sometimes couldn’t be utilized for product commercialization. As venture capitalists/angel investors were also less in number, so, private money was less available for early-stage companies in Finland (Kerr, Nanda and Brownell, 2013).
Following questions are answered in this case study solution
-
What factors lie behind the poor early-stage financing in Finland?
-
What are the basic differences across four models under consideration?
-
How should Ami and Otso structure their ventures? What specific “gaps” for the Nordic Region must their business model address?
-
Consider Italy instead of Finland—what are the opportunities and challenges in your entrepreneurship ecosystem?
-
Personal Takeaways can be derived from this Case?
Case Analysis for Entrepreneurial Finance In Finland
2. What are the basic differences across four models under consideration?
-
Accelerator: short-term (fixed end-date); provide support, coaching, training, and hands-on work opportunity; don’t provide large amounts of funding (average investment size: 10-20 thousand euro).
-
Incubator: long-term (no fixed end-date); provide training, networking opportunity, and various services (like marketing/accounting guidance, infrastructure, office space, and equipment, shared conference room, reception, and internet services); connect with VCs but generally don’t provide financing.
-
Micro-VC: attract funding from outside sources; smaller pool than traditional VCs (average investment size: 75 million euro).
-
VC (traditional): attract funding from outside sources; larger pool than micro-VC (multi-million euro fund) (Ries, 2011).
3. How should Ami and Otso structure their ventures? What specific “gaps” for the Nordic Region must their business model address?
Get instant access to this case solution for only $9
Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $9
Standard Price
$25
Save $16 on your purchase
-$16
Amount to Pay
$9
Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution
Calculate the Price
Related Case Solutions
- Yemeksepeti Growing And Expanding The Business Model Through Data Case Solution
- AccorHotels Digital Transformation A Response To Hospitality Disruptor Airbnb Case Solution
- R And R Case Solution
- Beyond Meat Taking On The Beef Industry Case Solution
- Flashfood Shop Self Service Retailing Of Fresh Meals In China Case Solution
Get More Out of This
Our essay writing services are the best in the world. If you are in search of a professional essay writer, place your order on our website.
