Get instant access to this case solution for only $15
Fiduciary Consulting: Bickering in Bean Town Case Solution
Boston Fiduciary Consultant’s work requires constant and effective communication between employees as the process of work requires contribution at each level. Carmen and Richmond’s reports were based on the work received form Anderson and Baxter. It was assumed that, with these four very competent employees at the Boston office, there would be considerable improvement in performance. However, the environment at the office was tense as the colleagues did not get along, especially Baxter who was impatient and rude to his peers. He also displayed irresponsibility and delay in his work, which further aggravated the situation. His peers were of the view that such behavior was unprofessional and was only being tolerated by the senior management because of Baxter’s work experience and competence.
Following questions are answered in this case study solution:
Introduction & Problem Statement
Fiduciary Consulting Bickering in Bean Town Case Analysis
There are four types of conflicts that can occur in a team, interpersonal, intrapersonal, intergroup, and intergroup. In the case of Fiduciary Consulting, an interpersonal conflict has emerged due to varying personalities of Baxter and Carmen. Carmen had lost interest in his work since his daughter died. However, Carmen had a strong work ethics as he came on time and religiously did his job. On the other hand, Baxter, who had excellent credentials was hired without a proper interview had poor work ethics. He came late in the office and left early. However, this was not the main reason due to which the interpersonal skill emerged. The underlying reason was hatred that was being nurtured by Carmen and Baxter. Carmen hated Baxter because he was demoted due to him. On the other hand, Baxter hated Carmen because he was whiny and according to Baxter, a deadweight burden.
The four key employees had taken differing stance to the situation. However, it is safe to assert that Carmen, Anderson, and Richmond joined forces against Baxter. Clearly, Baxter and Carmen had a competitive conflict in nature. On the other hand, Anderson had taken a conditional strategy i.e. in an extreme case he would take an extreme action. Richmond had taken avoidance strategy i.e. he completed ignored the conflict among the two supervisors. There are various steps that can be taken in order to resolve the conflict, but some bitter pills have to be taken in order to solve the problem. Smith needs to ensure that key employees are retained, and welfare of the company is given top priority.
The senior management should approach Baxter and inform him about the complaints received against his behavior. He should be strictly warned that his competence and experience is valuable, but he must not misuse that to belittle his peers and colleagues and that such behavior will not be tolerated in the future. The management must make him realize that his behavior is intolerable and is adversely effecting not only the work environment but also the company’s business. In this way, the company will be able to retain all of its key employees and Baxter would continue bringing in business and enriching the firm with his credentials and experience. Lack of knowledge regarding American markets is vital for the company as the competition is severe. Smith can ensure a routine in which work of Baxter and Carmen are not intertwined. However, that would act as a temporary solution because, at some point in time, they both will need to work together.
The management may also fire Baxter and can be replaced by Charlie Anderson. He may prove to be a successful CEO as he has been with the company for a long time and is familiar with the culture and relationships. He is focused towards customer satisfaction as his first priority and is not interested in office politics He is, therefore, likely to make a good leader who will provide Boston Consultants with a clear and focused direction. However, he must be encouraged to be more open in communication with his peers and subordinates in order to carry the work process smoothly. The company will have to forgo one of its key employees, Baxter, but this bitter pill should be taken in order to resolve the conflict for once and all. However, Anderson might face some problems in the initial phase as he lacks the experience that makes a person an executive.
Smith can fire Baxter as he has been spreading negativity around the company, which clearly has been hindering company’s performance as effective communication is very important at Fiduciary Consulting. Clearly, Carmen cannot be promoted again, and he has already lost interest in his job. Smith can hire another person who is competent as Baxter, but with a pleasant attitude and personality. Smith and his colleagues made the mistake of not interviewing Baxter properly. They should have checked his viability in the organizational culture. The new CEO will bring in a new vision for the company, and it will help the company to tackle its clientele in a new manner.
Get instant access to this case solution for only $15
Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15
Save $10 on your purchase
Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution
Calculate the Price
Get More Out of This
Our essay writing services are the best in the world. If you are in search of a professional essay writer, place your order on our website.