Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Introducing iSnack 2.0 The New Vegemite Case Solution

Solution Id Length Case Author Case Publisher
1524 1183 Words (5 Pages) Anat Keinan, Francis Farrelly, Michael Beverland Harvard Business School : 512020
This solution includes: A Word File A Word File

More than a billion social network posts were analysed in this research. It uncovered several different ways Australians liked to have Vegemite. Kraft Foods sensed the likelihood that they might get a great product repositioning or product extension idea for Vegemite. Thus, they rolled out another social media campaign named “How Do You Love Your Vegemite?”

Following questions are answered in this case study solution

  1. Why did Vegemite fail?

  2. Why did Talbot have to revitalize the brand?

  3. Kraft's decision to revitalize brand performance through the introduction of a brand extension. 

  4. Brand Extension and Brand Revitalization in the Social Media’s context. 

  5. Consumer Behaviour and Vegemite

Case Analysis for Introducing iSnack 2.0 The New Vegemite Case Solution

1. Why did Vegemite fail?

Vegemite is an iconic Australian brand; Australians are extremely involved and protective towards it. Vegemite is a very strong brand which is exceptionally high on its brand affinity. Australians associate the feelings of patriotism, safety, and happiness with Vegemite. 

With the New Vegemite's launch, the company was successful to sell 2 million jars of the New Vegemite with approximately household penetration as high as 12% in just two months. The results were incredible, which showed that people liked the new Vegemite Combination despite of the fact that it was released without a name initially and the new product had shorter shelf life and required refrigeration. After two months from the launch, Kraft Foods held a "Name Me Campaign” and invited suggestions for the new brand’s name from the Australians. The ‘Name Me' was also very successful as Kraft’s previous social media campaigns. People were highly involved and appreciated it. But when the name "iSnack 2.0” was launched, Kraft Foods got huge negative response and bashing on the internet. The new name for the brand was not accepted by the audience.

The Australians gave an immediate negative response to the name. The consumers were infuriated and showed their grievances and dislike through social media posts, so much so that the person who gave the name suggestion made to the list of 50 most hated people in Australia. This was primarily because Australian could not resonate with the name “iSnack 2.0”, it sounded more like technology then food. Another reason could be because the prefix “i” belonged to an American technology company “Apple” which hurt the Australian feelings of patriotism. It did not seem to be Australian anymore and they Australians did not feel the same connection with the new product that they felt with Vegemite.

2. Why did Talbot have to revitalize the brand?

Vegemite had been one of Kraft’s iconic products and a part of Australians’ life for more than 70 years. Australians loved Vegemite. Over the year Vegemite had managed to be a part of Australian households as a staple. It had an exceptionally good brand penetration (Approx. 80%) in the ANZ market. The sales for Kraft's products, especially Vegemite were increasing till the late 90's, and they reached an all-time-high in 2002. But after 2002, the sales were instable and volatile and showed a decreasing trend. 

By 2007, Kraft’s overall business position in Australia and New Zealand region was suffering. Kraft’s products were very popular among its consumers, but it was facing internal management issues. Also, Kraft Foods’ recent decision to build factories in Indonesia, Middle East and other regions where the exports’ demand was high resulted in a blow to Kraft’s ANZ business. The exports to these countries were primarily supplied form the AZN region; and the construction of factories in these regions resulted in overcapacity in the Australian factories, thus increasing the prices of per unit production.

Plus, a decline was also observed in the market share of many of Kraft’s products; Vegemite’s market share decreased by 8%. Seeing the overall situation, the newly appointment Kraft’s management decided to revitalize all its brands with special focus to Vegemite.

3. Kraft's decision to revitalize brand performance through the introduction of a brand extension. 

To revitalize the sales and decreasing brand performance, Kraft ANZ decided to get consumer insights by engaging in market research. For this research, Kraft’s management hired IBM’s services in 2008. The Key research objectives were;

  • To identify various trends and patterns Insights for the development of product extensions.

  • Find unique trends existing in the market.

Get instant access to this case solution for only $15

Get Instant Access to This Case Solution for Only $15

Standard Price

$25

Save $10 on your purchase

-$10

Amount to Pay

$15

Different Requirements? Order a Custom Solution

Calculate the Price

Approximately ~ 1 page(s)

Total Price

$0

Get More Out of This

Our essay writing services are the best in the world. If you are in search of a professional essay writer, place your order on our website.

Essay Writing Service
whatsapp chat icon

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

close icon